Join Our E-mail List
Click Here
Christian Action Network
WASHINGTON — For many Americans, today marks the
fifth anniversary of the start of an Iraq war that was not worth
fighting, one that has cost thousands of lives, and more than half a
trillion dollars. For the Bush administration, however, it is the
first anniversary of an Iraq strategy that it believes has finally
started to succeed.
It has been about a year since General Petraeus arrived to command
American forces in Iraq, Ambassador Ryan Crocker took over as the
chief American diplomat and the military deployed 30,000 more troops
to protect and rebuild neighborhoods.
Officials now running the American effort express frustration that
the gains wrought by their new security, political, and economic
policies — in particular, sharply reduced violence — are continually
weighed against the first four years of the war, when Iraq unraveled
in insurgency and sectarian strife.
"I came to Washington to describe what we're doing," Mr. Crocker's
senior deputy in charge of reconstruction and the Iraqi economy,
Charles Ries, said during a visit last week. "At almost every
meeting, somebody wants me to describe what we used to do. ... I
know why people raise these questions, but I don't feel it's
something I can speak to. The times were different then."
Today's policy is fundamentally different from the impatient
mind-set of 2003, in both lowered American expectations and a less
imperious approach to dealing with Iraqi authorities. "In those
days," Mr. Ries said, "we decided what (the Iraqis) needed, and we
built it." Today, he said, Iraqis are asked what they want, and then
told that while America will help, they will have to pay for most of
it themselves.
Yet as the administration now requests additional war funding and
calls for a pause in promised troop withdrawals, some question its
right to a second chance. "Like a tourniquet," the troop increase
"has stopped the bleeding," Senator Reed, a Democrat from Rhode
Island, a former Army Ranger and senior member of the Armed Services
Committee, reported last week after his 11th trip to Iraq. What he
has not seen, Mr. Reed said, are the surgery and recovery that would
begin to heal the wound that Iraq has become. And even American
officials acknowledge that the troop increase has not led to the
political reconciliation the administration had hoped for.
Others see the past year's successes as fragile and reversible, and
less consequential than the pain that preceded them. "I think they
have it righter than they ever have before," an Iraq expert with the
U.S. Institute of Peace, Daniel Serwer, said of the administration.
"But the fact is that those four other years did exist, and they
condition a lot of what can and cannot happen now. There's a history
here, there's a lot of blood and guts on the floor, literally."
| Add Comments | Join Our E-Mail list | Original Article |