Join Our E-mail List
Click Here
Christian Action Network
Agence France Press reported Monday, Feb.
25, on censorship by Islamist Muslim religious authorities in
Pakistan through an order to Internet providers to block YouTube.
The action is aimed at YouTube, banned in Pakistan because of
“blasphemous” content, or material considered offensive to Islam,
religious officials said on Sunday in reference to Shari’a rulings.
An inter-ministerial committee has decided to
block YouTube because it contained "blasphemous content, videos and
documents," a government official said.
"The site will remain blocked until further orders," he said.
Other officials said the site had been blocked because it contained
controversial sketches of the Prophet Mohammed…which were
republished by Danish newspapers earlier this month.
One major service provider, Micronet, said in an email to
subscribers that the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority had
directed all ISPs to block access to YouTube "for containing
blasphemous web content/movies."
"Meanwhile Internet users can write to YouTube.com to remove the
objectionable web content/movies because this removal would enable
the authorities to order un-blocking of this website," the email
said.
At least 17 Danish newspapers republished the controversial
[Muhammad} drawing, vowing to defend freedom of expression a day
after Danish police said they had foiled a plot to murder the
cartoonist.
In the latest in a series of demonstrations over the cartoons in
Pakistan, hundreds of hard-line Islamists in the southern city of
Karachi torched effigies of the Danish prime minister and the
cartoonist yesterday, witnesses said.
"Death to cartoonist," the demonstrators chanted.
Note to self, and our dear readers, critical
renderings of Islamism’s first convert, Muhammad, is considered
“blasphemy.”
This would seem to ascribe to the seventh-century brigand turned
self-proclaimed prophet the status of equal deity or holiness, equal
or approximate to God.
This is an interesting contradiction to Qur’anic verses opposed to
placing before God, indivisible, any “partners” or “begotten” heirs,
“equals” or near equals.
Just a thought, hmmm…
| Add Comments | Join Our E-Mail list | Original Article |